FREE ESSAY ON US VOTER PARTICIPATION

US VOTER PARTICIPATION

In a pluralist country such as America, there are numerous opinions over what society's
goals should be, and the best method of achieving them. In theory, every American citizen
has an equal say in the political affairs of this county. By participating in politics,
people air their voices and thereby contribute to nation through representatives, hence
the term representative democracy. It may seem to be beyond argument that political
participation is a key objective in all democratic institutions. However, there is room
for legitimate disagreement about the health of our democracy, in regards to the extent
of civic participation. This raises the important question of how much participation
there actually is in the United States. How many Americans take part in activities such
as voting, attending political meetings, joining political parties, or even discussing
politics with their neighbors? The answer is surprisingly few for a country that prides
itself on democracy. However, is this low level of participation hurting our nation?
In some respects, Americans are as ambivalent about political participation as they are
about democratic values. On the one hand, large numbers of Americans believe that the
ordinary citizen should play a part in public affairs. On the other hand, relatively few
Americans actually take the initiative do so. Americans often hypocritically express the
view that they are obligated as citizens to engage in politics, even though they are not
involved in any real form of political activity. This view suggests that Americans tend
to be more passive than active political participants. Active participation includes
attending political rallies, meetings, and fundraisers, trying to influence government,
joining interest groups, and of course voting. And this brings us to the controversial
topic of voter turn out in the United States. 
According to one common view, the quality of democracy depends upon the extent to which
voters use their rights to vote and to take part in public life. It is healthy if
memberships of political parties are large and active, and if attendance at political
rallies is high, and so on. Some nations believe that it is essential to take part in
political life, and that the state should encourage, and even oblige them to do so. For
example, some countries consider that it is vital to ensure that a high proportion of
eligible voters cast their ballots. Accordingly, they make voting compulsory, as in
Australia. An alternative view suggests that it does not matter whether citizens actually
participate in politics, but it is vital that they should have the right to do so,
irrespective of whether they choose to use it. This is perhaps the case in the United
States, where voter turnout hovers around an astounding fifty percent, which is lowest
among all industrialized democracies (Roskin 113.) 
In a democracy, a high priority is typically associated with voting (on a national
scale), as a way for people to influence policy makers. By electing officials to
represent their opinions, citizens are actively partaking in policy making. Citizens
choose between candidates competing for the authority to make public policy. Because of
America's democratic government, people declare their preferences for and against
officials and policies through elections, and the distribution of their votes is a
representation of their conflicts on selected political matters. And with such important
political matters affecting the every day lives of Americans, why is political
participation so low in our country? If voting is the fundamental method of political
expression in our representative democracy, why do so many Americans take their
democratic right for granted?
While nearly half of the voting population does not engage in civic participation, there
is concrete evidence on who is actually participating. And these numbers are heavily
accounted for, and studied by scientists. Voter percentages of various groups are often
evaluated by scientists to determine trends in the election process. This in turn may
help determine some of the causes of such a low turnout. 
Political scientists have observed a number of trends within different voting groups.
They have come to a conclusion that the percentages of voting groups can be directly
related to the social economic status of citizens. In hopes of uncovering clues behind
the mysterious participation rates, voter turnout can be investigated through comparison
of social groups. Scientists can all agree on a few aspects regarding these groups. "The
more educated tend to have greater familiarity with potential issues and participate most
heavily, with college graduates voting at nearly twice the rate of those who did not
complete high school (Lindblom 108.)" In addition, two other primary groups who represent
a high percentage of voter turnout are the elderly and higher income citizens. Educated
and higher income voters essentially go hand-in-hand, since those who are educated tend
to have a higher income level. The reason put forth for the positive relationship between
income and voting is that people who are struggling with everyday existence are not going
to have the time, the energy, or the resources to partake in nonessential activities such
as electoral participation. 
Now with knowledge of what groups are primarily voting at higher percentages, it still
remains hazy as to the reasoning behind people not voting. Political scientists have
pondered this question for decades, and have come up with a plethora of reasons, but no
concrete answers when dealing with the causes of low voter turnout. However, there are
many theories regarding the United State's embarrassing lack of political participation.

Many citizens simply do not vote because of common misconceptions involving numerous
factors of the election process. Perhaps low voter turnout can be traced to various
aspects revolving around a naive mindset of many Americans. One example that could sadly
have a detrimental affect is a level of political interest. Many people do not think that
the political process pertains to them. They question why they should get involved in
politics at all. These people, unfortunately, are the Americans who have no concept as to
what a democracy stands for. They do not realize that one voice can make a difference in
our government. And this brings up the unpretentious topic of basic intelligence. As
previously stated, educated people vote at a relatively higher percentage than those who
are not. At a higher level, education improves cognitive skills which allow for increased
understanding of the political process and the political issues that surround it.
Essentially, people are more likely to take part in something which they comprehend. Many
people simply do not understand government process, and therefore choose not to become
involved.
These types of people are in the same class as those who believe that voting requires
some sort of astounding effort, or cost in precious time. In an effort to increase voter
turnout, there are a couple of changes that can be considered for the people stated
above. Taken into account that the physical effort to vote is minimal, it theoretically
could be made even simpler. The "burden" of registration could be taken out of the hands
of the individual voters, and transferred to those of the government via some type of
"automatic" registration (just when you thought registering could not be facilitated).
This could possibly initiate the most lethargic of all Americans to vote. Mail in voting,
or the Internet, could also be feasible, provided that tamper-proof methods are utilized.
Also, the fact that elections are held on weekdays can not help the cause. If elections
were to be held on a weekend, or there became a law requiring employers to give workers
time to vote, as in Canada, there might be an increase in the turnout. Though these
issues are somewhat irrelevant, even comical one may add, they probably do play a role in
whether some Americans choose to vote. 
The lack of voter participation also involves the concept of efficacy, which undoubtedly
plays a role in the minds' of American voters. There may be a belief that they do not
have any affect on the political process. Many are unaware that voting, and other types
of political involvement, can actually have an influence on policy making. Yet another
factor may be partisanship, which is voter identification with a specific political
party. Many voters possess pride in partisanship, and voting becomes a competitive
mechanism. The outcome of an election becomes a personal matter. One theory is,
partisanship may be declining. Some possibly feel that candidates no longer represent
their respective parties. They feel that Republicans and Democrats have nearly converged
on the political spectrum, leaving the differences between them minute, or conceivably
non-existent. If a Republican or Democratic candidate is sure to win, and both are the
politically equal, what is the point in voting? 
Another thought provoking motive for involves the issue of trust. Many people remain
pessimistic about the entire political process. They just do not have confidence in the
govern-ment or candidate's ability to effectively govern. On the extreme other hand, the
decision to abstain from voting, and from otherwise taking part in political activities,
may reflect a voter's rational judgement that his future is safe in the hands of
whichever candidate emerges as winner. 
Another possible variable is the media and its involvement in politics. What effect does
live reporting of election results have on the voter turnout in the western regions the
United States? For example, when the final election results have already been tabulated
and announced in New York, the polls are still open in California. Once people on the
west coast know who is winning and who is not, are they more inclined to feel they don't
need to bother voting? Granted this scenario can also be reversed. It could be argued
that if people on the west coast see that their preferred candidate is losing, they might
be more likely to vote in order to show support. Nonetheless, this should be taken into
consideration. The media must also make changes in the way it conducts its political
reporting and analysis. A cerebral balance must be found between reporting the news, and
making the news, as seen with Florida controversy. Sensationalism and hype have become
the new definition of newsworthy, and negativity has become network news. We cannot
afford to have this continue. 
Yet another speculation as to why Americans have such a relatively low participation in
politics is call the "sleeping dogs" theory. This states that participation need only be
"intermittent and potential" for a democracy to function. Most leaders in a democracy are
fully aware that citizens lack a rooted political following. Correspondingly, most
politicians will work in an effort to keep the undisturbed public in a placid state.
However, they are conscious that society may become riled by things such as depression,
unpopular war, or high unemployment. In this case, the citizens will react by voting them
out of office at the next election. Accordingly, officials aim to keep the public
tranquil, and are pleased with no reaction at all (Roskin 113.) This underlying rationale
is perhaps the most prominent cause affecting voters. In essence, many Americans could
simply be content with the present condition of the country, and the how the government
is being operated. Theorists state that a democratic culture does not necessarily require
heavy voter turnout. "Rather it requires an attitude that, if aroused, the people will
participate-vote, contribute time and money, organize groups, and circulate petitions-and
that elected officials know this (Roskin 113.)" Considering this, do low levels of
participation negatively affect our country? 
Voting is a right, and is not required in the United States. Citizens who vote are
choosing to do so because they want their voices to be heard. And in the case of a
representative democracy, the people who vote are the ones who believe that their opinion
counts, and will make a difference. This concept is the backbone of democracy, and is
what our country thrives on. For the most part, these citizens are politically informed
and educated. A smaller number of these intelligent voters is preferable to massive
numbers who vote just for the sake of voting, and have no idea what issues they are
siding with. Essentially the right to vote should not be taken lightly. This act should
be done intelligently, not randomly. This brings us back to the idea of facilitating the
voting process. Is it really a good idea to make voting easier? We do not want the masses
to vote simply because they can easily do so, but to put forth an effort to vote wisely.
Many scholars believe that low civic participation is an underlying problem of American
social decay. Our nation is too complacent when it comes to political participation. Most
citizens are content to sit back and let a few elites decide the direction of our
country. The solution is not to just "go out and vote," but to be an informed voter. The
best way to accomplish this is to teach our children civic responsibility. Interests and
patterns developed early in life often carry all the way through adulthood. Teaching
young people about our democratic system and the importance of their personal involvement
yields powerful returns.